One sentence summary – The Redcar and Cleveland Council has rejected plans for a new caravan park near Brotton due to concerns about landscape alteration, planning policies, highway safety, visual impact, potential disturbance to wildlife, and impact on the access road, despite acknowledging the potential economic benefits.
At a glance
- The Redcar and Cleveland Council rejected plans for a new caravan park near Brotton.
- The proposed development included nine hardstanding pitches and new vehicle access.
- Ten car parking spaces were also part of the plans.
- The council cited concerns about landscape alteration, planning policies, highway safety, visual impact, and disturbance to wildlife.
- The Ramblers Association expressed concerns about the impact on the access road.
The details
The Redcar and Cleveland Council has recently rejected plans for a new caravan park near Brotton.
The proposed development was to be situated on farmland and included nine hardstanding pitches.
New vehicle access was also part of the proposal.
Additionally, ten car parking spaces were included in the plans.
However, the council decided that the project would fundamentally alter the landscape.
The council also stated that the project would be contrary to planning policies.
Highway safety was one of the concerns raised during the evaluation of the proposal.
It was noted that there may not be enough space for two vehicles with caravans to pass each other simultaneously.
This concern was highlighted by development engineers.
Some neighbors also objected to the development.
They expressed concerns about potential noise and litter.
Disturbance to wildlife was another concern raised by the neighbors.
The council also took into account the visual impact of the proposed caravan site.
Amended plans were provided, but they were not considered sufficient.
The council stated that the amended plans did not adequately screen the caravans from public view.
The visual impact was a significant factor in the council’s decision.
The Ramblers Association also expressed concern about the proposed development.
They were worried about the impact on the access road, which serves as a public right of way.
These concerns were taken into consideration during the evaluation process.
The council acknowledged that the development was small-scale.
They also noted that it could potentially generate economic benefits.
However, the council concluded that it would not enhance or improve the area.
In conclusion, the Redcar and Cleveland Council has refused plans for a new caravan park near Brotton.
The decision was based on concerns about the landscape, planning policies, highway safety, visual impact, and potential disturbance to wildlife.
The Ramblers Association also expressed concerns about the impact on the access road.
Despite the potential for economic benefits, the proposed development did not meet the criteria set by the council.
Article X-ray
Here are all the sources used to create this article:
A red “no entry” sign placed in front of a caravan on a grassy field.
This section links each of the article’s facts back to its original source.
If you have any suspicions that false information is present in the article, you can use this section to investigate where it came from.
| thenorthernecho.co.uk |
|---|
| – Plans for a new caravan park on farmland near Brotton have been refused by Redcar and Cleveland Council. – |
| The proposed development included nine hardstanding pitches, new vehicle access, and ten car parking spaces. – |
| The council deemed the development would fundamentally change the landscape and be contrary to planning policies. – Highway safety concerns were raised, and some neighbors objected to the development. |
| – Concerns were raised about potential noise, litter, and disturbance to wildlife. – |
| The proposed caravan site was considered to not enhance or improve the area. |
| – |
| The development was acknowledged to be small-scale and could generate economic benefits. – Amended plans were provided, but they were not considered sufficient to screen the caravans from public view. – Development engineers advised that there may not be enough space for two vehicles with caravans to pass each other at the same time. – |
| The Ramblers Association expressed concern about the impact on the access road, which is a public right of way. |
English 
Portuguese 
Turkish 
Chinese 
German