One sentence summary – Prominent US authors, including George RR Martin and John Grisham, have filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging that their books were used without permission to train the company’s language model, ChatGPT. OpenAI has responded by stating its respect for authors’ rights and engaging in discussions to address concerns. Legal experts suggest that proving copyright infringement may be challenging, and some believe the authors’ concerns are more related to potential job displacement caused by AI. The case raises broader concerns about AI’s impact on human-authored content and job displacement.
At a glance
- Prominent US authors George RR Martin, John Grisham, and others have filed a lawsuit against OpenAI.
- The authors allege that their books were used without permission to train ChatGPT and other language models.
- The lawsuit has been filed in a federal court in Manhattan by the Authors Guild.
- OpenAI has responded, stating that it respects authors’ rights and is engaging in discussions to address concerns.
- The case raises concerns about AI’s impact on human-authored content and potential job displacement.
The details
Prominent US authors George RR Martin and John Grisham, along with other notable authors such as Jonathan Franzen, Jodi Picoult, and George Saunders, have filed a lawsuit against OpenAI.
OpenAI is the owner of ChatGPT, a large language model.
The authors allege that their books were used without their permission to train ChatGPT and other large language models developed by OpenAI.
The lawsuit has been filed in a federal court in Manhattan.
The Authors Guild, a US trade group representing the named authors, is the entity that brought the lawsuit.
OpenAI has responded to the allegations.
The company stated that it respects the rights of authors and believes they should benefit from AI technology.
OpenAI has engaged in productive conversations with creators, including the Authors Guild, to address their concerns.
The lawsuit argues that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books without the authors’ permission.
This training enabled ChatGPT to provide accurate summaries.
The case raises concerns about the potential displacement of human-authored content by AI technology in the media industry.
Legal experts have suggested that the authors may face challenges in proving that ChatGPT directly copied and duplicated their work.
Some experts believe that the authors’ concerns are more related to the potential job displacement caused by AI rather than copyright infringement itself.
This lawsuit is not an isolated incident.
Similar concerns have been raised in other fields such as digital art and computing.
These concerns have led to lawsuits against generative AI developers.
None of the lawsuits mentioned in the article have been resolved as of yet.
In summary, the lawsuit filed by George RR Martin, John Grisham, and other authors against OpenAI alleges copyright infringement.
The authors claim their books were used without permission to train ChatGPT.
OpenAI has expressed its willingness to address the concerns raised by the authors.
The company is currently engaged in discussions with the Authors Guild.
The case highlights concerns about AI technology’s potential impact on human-authored content and potential job displacement.
However, legal experts suggest that proving copyright infringement may be challenging in this context.
Article X-ray
Here are all the sources used to create this article:
A group of authors holding a gavel, facing a futuristic AI entity with a question mark above its head.
This section links each of the article’s facts back to its original source.
If you have any suspicions that false information is present in the article, you can use this section to investigate where it came from.
| bbc.co.uk |
|---|
| – US authors George RR Martin and John Grisham are suing OpenAI, the owner of ChatGPT, over copyright infringement claims. – |
| The lawsuit alleges that the authors’ books were used without permission to train ChatGPT and other large language models. – OpenAI has stated that it respects the rights of authors and believes they should benefit from AI technology. – |
| The Authors Guild, a US trade group representing the named authors, has brought the case to federal court in Manhattan. – Other prominent authors named in the complaint include Jonathan Franzen, Jodi Picoult, and George Saunders. – OpenAI is currently engaged in productive conversations with creators, including the Authors Guild, to address their concerns. – |
| The lawsuit argues that ChatGPT was fed data from copyrighted books without author permission, enabling it to provide accurate summaries. – |
| The case raises concerns about the displacement of human-authored content by AI technology in the media industry. |
| – Legal experts suggest that the authors may face challenges in proving that ChatGPT copied and duplicated their work. – Some experts believe that the authors’ concerns are more related to the potential job displacement caused by AI rather than copyright infringement. – Similar concerns have been raised in the digital art and computing fields, leading to other lawsuits against generative AI developers. |
| – None of the lawsuits mentioned in the article have been resolved yet. |
English 
Portuguese 
Turkish 
Chinese 
German