One sentence summary – A recent study by Datafolha has found that President Lula’s approval ratings have remained stable during his third term, with 38% of respondents viewing him as good or excellent, 30% perceiving him as average, and 31% viewing him as bad or terrible, suggesting enduring popularity among a significant portion of the population despite political instability and economic factors.
At a glance
- President Lula’s approval ratings have remained stable during his third term
- 38% of respondents view President Lula as good or excellent
- 30% of those surveyed perceive him as average
- 31% of respondents view him as bad or terrible
- The disapproval rating increased from 27% to 31%, but experts consider it insignificant
President Lula’s approval ratings have remained stable during his third term, a recent study by Datafolha has found.
The research, which surveyed 2,016 people across 139 cities, showed that 38% of respondents view President Lula as good or excellent.
Conversely, 30% of those surveyed perceive him as average.
31% of respondents view him as bad or terrible.
The study has a margin of error of two points, plus or minus, suggesting a high level of accuracy.
2% of the individuals surveyed were unable to provide their opinion on President Lula.
The only index that saw a fluctuation beyond the margin of error, compared to the previous survey in June, was the disapproval rating.
In June, the disapproval rating stood at 27%.
Experts have noted that this increase in disapproval is not considered a significant spike.
Despite political instability, President Lula’s approval ratings have remained steady.
This stability suggests enduring popularity among a significant portion of the population.
Various factors have been attributed to this stability.
One such factor is President Lula’s recent decision to allocate ministries to a conservative group.
This decision followed discussions aimed at expanding the space of the pork barrel faction in Congress.
The economy, as indicated by key factors such as inflation and unemployment, has remained relatively stable.
This economic stability has not significantly impacted the popularity of government officials.
This suggests that public perception of President Lula and his administration is not solely dependent on economic factors.
The Datafolha research study provides evidence that President Lula’s approval ratings have remained steady during his third term.
Despite political turbulence, the president’s popularity has not significantly wavered.
The allocation of ministries to a conservative group and the controlled path of important economic indicators are likely contributors to this stability.
Monitoring future developments will be crucial to gain a comprehensive understanding of President Lula’s evolving public support.
Here are all the sources used to create this article:
A pixelated image of a smiling face with a consistent line graph in the background.
This section links each of the article’s facts back to its original source.
If you have any suspicions that false information is present in the article, you can use this section to investigate where it came from.
|– President Lula’s approval ratings have remained stable during his third term
– 38% of people consider President Lula to be good or excellent, while 30% consider him to be average and 31% consider him to be bad or terrible
|The data was verified by a recent research conducted by Datafolha, with 2,016 people interviewed in 139 cities
– The margin of error for the research is two points, plus or minus
– 2% of those surveyed were unable to give their opinion
– The only index that fluctuated above the margin of error compared to the previous survey in June was disapproval, which was 27% at that time
– This increase in disapproval is not considered a spike
– Despite political instability, President Lula has maintained his approval ratings
– The president gave ministries to a conservative group after discussions about expanding the space of the pork barrel faction in Congress
– Inflation and unemployment, which are important indicators of the economy, have been following a controlled path and have not significantly affected the popularity of government officials.
We're sorry about that.
Please help us identify the bias by copy and pasting any biased sentences here...