Zusammenfassung in einem Satz – Former Tory prime ministers, including David Cameron and Boris Johnson, have voiced concerns about potential changes to the HS2 project, while the government’s infrastructure tsar and other proponents emphasize the negative message that abandoning the project would send, leaving the future of HS2 uncertain amidst ongoing debates and political decisions.
Auf einen Blick
- Former Tory prime ministers, including David Cameron and Boris Johnson, have voiced concerns about potential changes to the HS2 project.
- Boris Johnson has labeled suggestions of cutting the Birmingham to Manchester route as “desperate” and “Treasury-driven nonsense.”
- Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt are reportedly considering axing the northern section of HS2, despite £2.3bn already being spent on it.
- The budget for HS2 was initially set at £55.7bn in 2015 but is now reported to have surpassed £100bn.
- Sir John Armitt, chair of the National Infrastructure Commission, warns that scrapping the second leg of HS2 would send a negative message about the UK’s ability to handle ambitious building projects.
Die Details
Former Tory prime ministers, including David Cameron and Boris Johnson, have voiced concerns about potential changes to the HS2 project.
Boris Johnson has labeled suggestions of cutting the Birmingham to Manchester route as “desperate” and “Treasury-driven nonsense.”
David Cameron has privately expressed significant concerns about potential alterations to the high-speed rail line.
Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt are reportedly considering axing the northern section of HS2, despite £2.3bn already being spent on it.
George Osborne, who originally approved HS2 as chancellor, has criticized the proposed cuts.
Labour’s official policy is to build HS2 in full, including the Leeds spur, but there has been some uncertainty in their statements recently.
HS2 has faced significant delays and rising costs, which have fueled criticism.
The budget for HS2 was initially set at £55.7bn in 2015 but is now reported to have surpassed £100bn.
The cost of building the first phase of HS2 has increased by at least a fifth in the last year.
The eastern leg of HS2 to Leeds has already been scrapped, further eroding the project’s purpose.
Scrapping phase two of HS2 is estimated to save £35 billion.
The economic case for HS2 has been argued to have collapsed before construction began.
The Infrastructure and Projects Authority’s assessment of HS2 suggested it was “unachievable.”
Transport policymakers tend to favor low-return, high-risk projects over high-return, low-risk alternatives.
There are questions about the way infrastructure is financed and planned in Britain.
HS2 may cost as much as £396 million per mile, making it one of the world’s most expensive railways.
The taxpayer is leaning towards discarding the project, even if vested interests may not.
Sir John Armitt, chair of the National Infrastructure Commission, warns that scrapping the second leg of HS2 would send a negative message about the UK’s ability to handle ambitious building projects.
The government is considering cutting the sections north of Birmingham and terminating the line at Old Oak Common station instead of Euston.
Sir John warns that abandoning the project would send a negative message to investors and challenges the UK’s ambition.
The HS2 project is facing significant controversy due to concerns over its cost, delays, and potential alterations.
Former Tory prime ministers have expressed reservations, while the government’s infrastructure tsar and other proponents emphasize the negative message that abandoning the project would send.
With rising costs and questions about infrastructure planning and financing, the future of HS2 remains uncertain amidst ongoing debates and political decisions.
Artikel Röntgen
Hier sind alle Quellen, die zur Erstellung dieses Artikels verwendet wurden:
A train track splitting into two paths with people on one side expressing concerns and people on the other side engaged in a heated debate.
In diesem Abschnitt werden alle Fakten des Artikels mit der Originalquelle verknüpft.
Wenn Sie den Verdacht haben, dass der Artikel falsche Informationen enthält, können Sie in diesem Abschnitt nachforschen, woher die Informationen stammen.
| news.sky.com |
|---|
| – Former Tory prime ministers have expressed concerns about the potential axing of part of the HS2 project. – Boris Johnson called suggestions of cutting the Birmingham to Manchester route “desperate” and “Treasury-driven nonsense. |
| ” – David Cameron has privately raised significant concerns about potential alterations to the high-speed rail line. – |
| The government’s infrastructure tsar, Sir John Armitt, warned that cancelling the Manchester leg would be a “tragedy” and send a negative message to investors. – |
| The planned HS2 railway is intended to link London, the Midlands, and the north of England but has faced delays and rising costs. – |
| The budget for HS2 was initially set at £55.7bn in 2015, but reports suggest the bill has surpassed £100bn. |
| – Parts of the project have already been paused or axed, with the eastern leg between Birmingham and Leeds reduced to a spur line. |
| – Construction between Birmingham and Crewe has been delayed by two years, and services may not reach central London until the 2040s. |
| telegraph.co.uk |
|---|
| – The economic case for HS2 has been argued to have collapsed before construction began. |
| – Concerns were raised about the project’s cost, scale, political significance, and outdated technology. – |
| The cost of building the first phase of HS2 has increased by at least a fifth in the last year. |
| – Boris Johnson reapproved the project in 2020 when estimated costs had already reached £100 billion. – |
| The eastern leg of HS2 to Leeds has been scrapped, further eroding the project’s purpose. – |
| The Infrastructure and Projects Authority’s assessment of HS2 suggested it was “unachievable. |
| ” – There are questions about the way infrastructure is financed and planned in Britain. – Transport policymakers tend to favor low-return, high-risk projects over high-return, low-risk alternatives. – HS2 may cost as much as £396 million per mile, making it one of the world’s most expensive railways. – |
| The Birmingham to Manchester spur of HS2 should be canceled to save costs. |
| – Scrapping phase two of HS2 could save £35 billion. – Rishi Sunak is opposed to “economic fairytales” and must decide whether to fund the next phase or discard the project. – |
| The taxpayer would prefer the latter option, even if vested interests may not. |
| Independent.co.uk |
|---|
| – Sir John Armitt, chair of the National Infrastructure Commission, warns that scrapping the second leg of HS2 would be a tragedy and send a negative message about the UK’s ability to handle ambitious building projects. – Boris Johnson and David Cameron both oppose cutting back HS2, with Johnson calling it “total Treasury-driven nonsense” and emphasizing the need to connect the Midlands with the North. – Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt are considering axing the northern section of HS2, despite £2.3bn already being spent on it. – George Osborne, who originally approved HS2 as chancellor, has criticized the proposed cuts. – |
| The government is considering cutting the sections north of Birmingham and terminating the line at Old Oak Common station instead of Euston. |
| – Sir John warns that abandoning the project would send a negative message to investors and challenges the UK’s ambition. |
| – HS2 is a high-speed rail line intended to connect London, the Midlands, and major cities in the North, improving journey times and releasing capacity on existing railway lines. |
| – Rishi Sunak and Boris Johnson have already canceled the leg to Leeds via Sheffield. – Labour’s official policy is to build HS2 in full, including the Leeds spur, but there has been some uncertainty in their statements recently. – |
| Pulling the legislation for the northern phase of HS2 would complicate the process for a new government trying to complete it. |
English 
Portuguese 
Turkish 
Chinese 
German