One sentence summary – Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut and Congress leader Jairam Ramesh have criticized the new Parliament building in India, raising concerns about its design, functionality, and impact on parliamentary discourse, with Raut specifically questioning the use of abuses in proceedings and the silence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah, while Ramesh has pointed out perceived shortcomings in the building’s design and lack of historical significance, highlighting the need for a comprehensive evaluation of the building and the importance of balancing modernization with preserving the functionality and historical significance of parliamentary institutions.
At a glance
- Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut and Congress leader Jairam Ramesh criticize the new Parliament building in India.
- Raut describes it as a “mega show” and coins the term “Modi multiplex” to describe it.
- Raut questions the use of abuses in parliamentary proceedings and expresses concern about declining standards of decorum.
- Ramesh points out shortcomings in the building’s design and functionality and expresses disappointment in the lack of historical significance.
- Both Raut and Ramesh highlight the need for a comprehensive evaluation of the new Parliament building and the importance of maintaining a balance between modernization and preserving historical significance.
Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut and Congress leader Jairam Ramesh have recently voiced strong criticism towards the new Parliament building in India.
Their comments have brought to light a number of concerns regarding the building’s design, functionality, and the quality of parliamentary discourse within its walls.
Raut, a vocal critic of the new building, has described it as a “mega show” and has even coined the term “Modi multiplex” to describe it.
He has specifically criticized the use of abuses in parliamentary proceedings.
Raut has questioned the silence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah on this issue.
He has expressed concern about the declining standards of parliamentary decorum and the potential impact this may have on meaningful discussions.
Jairam Ramesh has also voiced criticism of the new Parliament building.
Ramesh has pointed out several perceived shortcomings and deficiencies in the building’s design and functionality.
Like Raut, Ramesh has referred to the structure as “Modi Multiplex” or “Modi Marriot”.
He has expressed disappointment in the lack of historical significance and the perceived decline of substantive debates within the new building.
Raut has further voiced his displeasure about the absence of a lobby, corridors, and a central hall in the new building.
He believes these are essential components of any parliamentary setup.
These omissions in the design have raised concerns about the effectiveness and efficiency of parliamentary proceedings.
Both Raut and Ramesh have been critical of the new Parliament building from their respective party’s perspectives.
Raut represents the Shiv Sena, a regional party in Maharashtra.
Ramesh is a prominent leader of the Congress party.
Insights and Evaluation
Their criticisms provide insights into the concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the design, functionality, and the overall impact of the new Parliament building.
This development highlights the need for a comprehensive evaluation of the new Parliament building.
This evaluation should take into account the concerns raised by various stakeholders.
The criticisms highlighted by Raut and Ramesh underscore the importance of maintaining a balance between modernization and preserving the historical significance and functionality of parliamentary institutions.
As this issue continues to gain traction, it remains to be seen how the government will address the concerns raised by these political leaders.
The government will need to ensure that the new Parliament building upholds the highest standards of parliamentary discourse and functionality.
This brief provides a comprehensive summary of the available facts and information about the news story while maintaining a neutral perspective.
Here are all the sources used to create this article:
A group of people standing in front of a modern building with puzzled expressions on their faces.
This section links each of the article’s facts back to its original source.
If you have any suspicions that false information is present in the article, you can use this section to investigate where it came from.
|– Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut criticizes the new Parliament building, calling it a “mega show”
– Raut refers to the building as a “Modi multiplex” and criticizes the use of abuses in Parliament
– Raut questions the silence of the PM and Union Home Minister Amit Shah regarding the use of abuses in Parliament
– Jairam Ramesh also criticizes the new Parliament building, highlighting shortcomings and deficiencies in its design and functionality
– Ramesh refers to the building as “Modi Multiplex” or “Modi Marriot” and expresses disappointment in the decline of meaningful discussions
– Raut expresses displeasure about the lack of a lobby, corridors, and a central hall in the new structure
– Raut feels that the new building lacks the historical significance of the old building
We're sorry about that.
Please help us identify the bias by copy and pasting any biased sentences here...