One sentence summary – A court battle is underway in Kensington, London, as Michael Lee and his wife, King-Su Huang, dispute the ownership of their £4m house with their nephew, Cheng-Jen Ku, who purchased the property in his name but the couple claims they are the rightful owners.
At a glance
- A high-profile court battle is currently underway in Kensington, London.
- Michael Lee and his wife, King-Su Huang, are disputing the ownership of their £4m house.
- The couple’s nephew, Cheng-Jen Ku, is the other party involved in the dispute.
- The property in question is located in a mews near the Royal Albert Hall and is accessed through a Grade-II Listed archway.
- The couple asserts that they are the rightful owners, while the nephew claims the house was gifted to him.
The details
A high-profile court battle is currently underway in Kensington, London.
Michael Lee and his wife, King-Su Huang, are disputing the ownership of their £4m house.
The couple’s nephew, Cheng-Jen Ku, is the other party involved in the dispute.
The property in question is located in a mews near the Royal Albert Hall.
It is accessed through a Grade-II Listed archway.
Interestingly, the house was purchased in the nephew’s name.
However, the couple asserts that they are the rightful owners.
Ms.
King is suing her nephew over the ownership of the house.
She alleges that she has always been the true owner of the property.
According to her, there was a clear understanding between her and her nephew.
She claims that her nephew was holding the property on trust for her.
On the other hand, Mr.
Cheng has a different perspective.
He argues that the house was gifted to him by his aunt.
He believes that this gift aligns with Taiwanese customs.
He also suggests that his aunt may still have rights to a “minority” stake in the property.
Mr.
Lee has provided further details about the purchase of the house.
He claims that his wife gave their nephew £1.57m to purchase the house in his name.
The couple preferred not to have all their properties registered under their names.
Since its purchase, the property’s value has more than doubled.
Mr.
Lee has made serious accusations against his nephew.
He accuses him of attempting to steal their house.
He describes his nephew as a “devious little sod.”
These claims have been brought to the forefront in the ongoing legal battle.
Both sides are presenting their arguments in court.
The judge presiding over the case is expected to reserve his ruling.
The ruling will be made at a later date, after considering all the evidence and testimonies.
This dispute over property ownership has captivated attention.
The prominent location of the property and the significant financial value at stake are key factors.
This comprehensive brief provides a detailed account of the dispute between Michael Lee, King-Su Huang, and their nephew Cheng-Jen Ku.
The dispute is over the ownership of their Kensington house.
Article X-ray
Here are all the sources used to create this article:
Two figures standing on opposite sides of a grand house, pointing and gesturing towards it.
This section links each of the article’s facts back to its original source.
If you have any suspicions that false information is present in the article, you can use this section to investigate where it came from.
| independent.co.uk |
|---|
| – Michael Lee and his wife King-Su Huang are in a court battle with their nephew over ownership of their £4m house in Kensington, London. – |
| The house was bought in the name of their nephew, Cheng-Jen Ku, but the couple claims they are the true owners. |
| – Ms King is suing her nephew, alleging that she was always the rightful owner. |
| – Mr Cheng argues that the house was gifted to him by his aunt. |
| – Mr Lee describes his nephew as a “devious little sod” and accuses him of trying to steal their house. – |
| The property is located in a mews near the Royal Albert Hall and is accessed through a Grade-II Listed archway. |
| – Mr Lee claims that his wife gave their nephew £1.57m to buy the house in his name to avoid having all their properties in their names. – |
| The house is now worth more than twice the price paid. |
| – Ms King’s barrister argues that there was a clear understanding that she was the true owner, with her nephew holding it on trust for her. – Mr Cheng’s barrister claims that the intention was to give the property to him. |
| – Mr Cheng believes that the house was a gift from his aunt in line with Taiwanese custom. |
| – Mr Cheng admits that his aunt may still have rights to a “minority” stake in the property. – |
| The judge is expected to reserve his ruling until a later date. |
English 
Portuguese 
Turkish 
Chinese 
German