One sentence summary – Chief Justice of India, D.Y. Chandrachud, addressed the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) South Asia Conference, where he highlighted the gender disparity among Indian arbitrators on international panels and emphasized the importance of diversity, inclusion, and legal evolution in enhancing the justice delivery system.
At a glance
- Less than 10% of Indian arbitrators on international panels are women
- Unconscious bias contributes to the gender imbalance among arbitrators
- Use of gender-neutral pronouns in legislation and rules is suggested as a solution
- Cooperation between India and Singapore aims to adapt legal frameworks to the digital economy
- India has made progress in encouraging the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms
The details
Chief Justice of India, D.Y. Chandrachud, recently addressed the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) South Asia Conference.
During his address, he highlighted the gender disparity among Indian arbitrators on international panels.
Justice Chandrachud revealed that less than 10% of all Indian arbitrators on these panels are women.
He referred to a report on Gender Diversity during his address.
This report identified unconscious bias as a contributing factor to the gender imbalance among arbitrators.
The report also suggested the use of gender-neutral pronouns in legislation and rules as a potential solution.
Despite some arbitration rules implementing gender-neutral pronouns, the majority of empanelled arbitrators remain men.
Justice Chandrachud emphasized the importance of diversity and inclusion in all institutions of dispute resolution.
He underlined the need to learn from each other’s successes and difficulties, particularly among South Asian countries with shared cultural, social, and business practices.
The Chief Justice also discussed the need for legal evolution in line with the expansion of the digital economy.
He highlighted a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between India and Singapore.
This MoU aims to advance cooperation in judicial education and research.
It is intended to help legal frameworks adapt and keep pace with the changing landscape.
The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) has played a crucial role in assisting countries in simplifying and standardizing their laws and rules.
UNCITRAL’s efforts have made the justice delivery system more accessible.
They have also promoted a fair and efficient dispute resolution process.
India has made significant progress in encouraging the use of alternative dispute redressal mechanisms.
Legislative efforts and a focus on party autonomy have reduced unease among contracting parties.
This has further highlighted the importance of arbitration as the preferred mode of dispute resolution.
Indian courts have been proactive in supporting and promoting the use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms.
This article encompasses the main points derived from multiple sources.
It highlights the gender disparity issue in Indian arbitration panels raised by Chief Justice Chandrachud.
It emphasizes the importance of diversity, inclusion, legal evolution, and the role of international collaboration in enhancing the justice delivery system.
Article X-ray
Here are all the sources used to create this article:
A group of diverse figures, symbolizing Indian arbitrators, stand side by side with the Chief Justice of India, representing unity and addressing gender disparity.
This section links each of the article’s facts back to its original source.
If you have any suspicions that false information is present in the article, you can use this section to investigate where it came from.
| thehindu.com |
|---|
| – Less than 10% of all Indian arbitrators on international panels are women, according to Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud. – Justice Chandrachud referred to a report on Gender Diversity that identified unconscious bias as a contributing factor to the gender imbalance. – |
| Some arbitration rules have employed gender-neutral pronouns, but the majority of empanelled arbitrators are men. – |
| The CJI emphasized the importance of diversity and inclusion in all institutions of dispute resolution. – South Asian countries have similarities in cultural, social, and business practices, making it possible to learn from each other’s successes and difficulties. – Legal frameworks must evolve alongside the expansion of the digital economy. – |
| The MoU signed between India and Singapore on advancing cooperation in judicial education and research is a step towards this evolution. |
| – UNCITRAL has assisted countries in simplifying and uniformizing their laws and rules, making the justice delivery system more accessible. |
| – Legislative efforts in India and a focus on party autonomy have reduced unease among contracting parties and highlighted the importance of alternative dispute redressal mechanisms. – India has steadily made arbitrations the preferred mode of dispute resolution, with Indian courts encouraging the use of ADR mechanisms. |
| thehindu.com |
|---|
| – Less than 10% of all Indian arbitrators on international panels are women, according to Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud. – Justice Chandrachud spoke at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) South Asia Conference. – |
| He noted that while international arbitral institutions have diverse panels of arbitrators, the gender composition is imbalanced. – |
| A report on Gender Diversity identified unconscious bias as a contributing factor to this gender disparity. – |
| The report suggests using gender-neutral pronouns in legislation and rules to address the issue. – |
| The CJI emphasized the importance of women’s inclusion in all institutions of dispute resolution. |
| – He highlighted the need for countries to learn from each other’s successes and difficulties in their legal systems. – |
| The CJI mentioned the MoU signed between India and Singapore on advancing cooperation in judicial education and research. |
| – He stated that legal frameworks must evolve alongside the expansion of the digital economy. |
| – UNCITRAL has assisted countries in simplifying and standardizing their laws and rules, making the justice delivery system more accessible. – Legislative efforts in India and a focus on party autonomy have reduced unease among contracting parties. – India has prioritized arbitration as the preferred mode of dispute resolution, with Indian courts encouraging the use of ADR mechanisms. – |
| The function was attended by the Attorney General for India and senior advocate Fali Nariman. |
English 
Portuguese 
Turkish 
Chinese 
German