One sentence summary – California Governor Gavin Newsom has vetoed a bill that would have included a parent’s affirmation of their child’s gender identity in custody and visitation decisions, citing the need for caution when the Executive and Legislative branches intervene in the legal standards of the Judicial branch, despite expressing commitment to advancing transgender rights.
At a glance
- California Governor Gavin Newsom has vetoed a bill on including a parent’s affirmation of their child’s gender identity in custody and visitation decisions.
- Newsom emphasized caution when the Executive and Legislative branches intervene in the legal standards of the Judicial branch.
- The proposed bill would have considered gender affirmation as one factor among several already evaluated in custody proceedings.
- Existing laws already require courts to consider the health, safety, and welfare of the child, including a parent’s affirmation of their child’s gender identity.
- All Republican senators voted against the bill, claiming excessive interference with parental choices.
The details
California Governor Gavin Newsom has vetoed a bill that sought to include a parent’s affirmation of their child’s gender identity in custody and visitation decisions.
Newsom, while expressing his commitment to advancing transgender rights, stressed the need for caution when the Executive and Legislative branches intervene in the legal standards of the Judicial branch.
The proposed bill would have considered gender affirmation as one factor among several already evaluated in custody proceedings.
These factors include abuse and parental contact.
It is important to clarify that the bill would not have prioritized gender affirmation over other factors.
The level of affirmation can vary based on the child’s age and individual circumstances.
Assemblymember Lori Wilson, who introduced the bill, expressed disappointment with the governor’s veto.
Wilson’s intention was to provide the transgender community with a voice within the family court system.
Governor Newsom argued that existing laws already require courts to consider the health, safety, and welfare of the child.
This includes a parent’s affirmation of their child’s gender identity.
It is noteworthy that all Republican senators voted against the bill.
One senator claimed that lawmakers were excessively interfering with parental choices.
This veto decision occurs in the context of ongoing political battles concerning transgender rights across the United States.
Governor Newsom also vetoed bills related to self-driving trucks and sharing information about incarcerated immigrants with federal officials.
This brief has been written from a neutral perspective, aiming to present all relevant information regarding the news story.
Article X-ray
Here are all the sources used to create this article:
A person holding a sign with a gender-neutral symbol and a red cross over it.
This section links each of the article’s facts back to its original source.
If you have any suspicions that false information is present in the article, you can use this section to investigate where it came from.
| independent.co.uk |
|---|
| – California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vetoed a bill that would have required judges to consider a parent’s affirmation of their child’s gender identity in custody and visitation decisions. |
| – Newsom stated that while he is committed to advancing the rights of transgender Californians, he believes caution should be exercised when the Executive and Legislative branches attempt to dictate legal standards for the Judicial branch. – |
| The bill would have included gender affirmation as one factor among many that courts already consider in custody proceedings, such as abuse and parental contact. – |
| The bill would not have prioritized gender affirmation over other factors, as affirmation varies depending on the child and their age. – Assemblymember Lori Wilson, who introduced the bill, expressed disappointment with the governor’s veto, stating that her intent was to give the trans community a voice in the family court system. |
| – Newsom argued that existing laws already require courts to consider health, safety, and welfare, including a parent’s affirmation of their child’s gender identity. – All Republican senators voted against the bill, with one arguing that lawmakers were interfering too much with parental choices. – |
| The veto comes amidst ongoing political battles over transgender rights across the country. – Newsom also vetoed bills related to self-driving trucks and sharing information about incarcerated immigrants with federal officials. |
English 
Portuguese 
Turkish 
Chinese 
German